评论： http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/ "Unfortunately no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself." Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:11:53 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 来自：Do What Vinci Will Do http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-259 Do What Vinci Will Do Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:56:17 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-259 网摘2005?2006

这个是2005年12月到2006年1月之间的网摘。待整?。
——————————————————————————–

网摘2006

2006年1月25日

23:48

2005年IT江湖?怨录

?文档 http://tech.sina.com.cn/...

]]> 来自：对牛乱弹? | Playin’ with IT » Blog Archive » 昨日新闻 - 2.0背?的技术 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-228 对牛乱弹? | Playin’ with IT » Blog Archive » 昨日新闻 - 2.0背?的技术 Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:49:06 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-228 [...] 2.0背?的技术 # 关于我的blog的两点说明 # [...]

]]> 来自：Rahmat http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-227 Rahmat Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:27:44 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-227 My email Rahmatcn@msn.com , Please reply :) My email Rahmatcn@msn.com , Please reply :)

]]> 来自：Rahmat http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-226 Rahmat Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:26:11 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-226 Hello Mr.keso , can u tell me 2.0 用php 还是 用 asp? or Jsp..
thanks…
MySQL+PHP+Apache ?以?2.0网?

]]> 来自：yaO http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-223 yaO Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:45:16 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-223 其实也无所谓 其实也无所谓

]]> 来自：keven http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-222 keven Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:44:40 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-222 to zq: terribly sorry that i forgot to reply. my email address is always kevenlw#gmail.com (change # to @ pls). if it not works, try kevenlw#msn.com. sorry for the inconvenience. to zq: terribly sorry that i forgot to reply. my email address is always kevenlw#gmail.com (change # to @ pls). if it not works, try kevenlw#msn.com. sorry for the inconvenience.

]]> 来自：Jack http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-221 Jack Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:49:45 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-221 Good article. I especially like this “真?是足够简?的。一件事物如果越弄越??，那么还是?早放弃，因为它多?是在?与真?相??的方?走”

]]> 来自：keven http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-215 keven Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:12:20 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-215 谢谢sunshine。
to??：我真的没写2.0的文章，正在完?您推??给《图书馆专刊》的作业呢??过Jackie应该?久?以出?一篇，呵呵。

]]> 来自：?? http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-214 ?? Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:40:18 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-214 喂喂，Keven，尽管我很想先?为快，你那篇L2还是先给河边先生?。中国的OA圈?目?比?志还是?了一圈，别这样无所谓好?好。

]]> 来自：SeeSunshine http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-213 SeeSunshine Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:43:24 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-213 我这有Tim的文章翻译 http://spaces.msn.com/members/seesunshine 我这有Tim的文章翻译
http://spaces.msn.com/members/seesunshine

]]> 来自：zq http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-212 zq Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:15:46 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-212 Please send me your "correct" email address. I sent you a message but was bounced back. Please send me your “correct” email address. I sent you a message but was bounced back.

]]> 来自：平?江 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-211 平?江 Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:53:58 +0000 http://keven.wordpress.com/2006/01/15/20%e8%83%8c%e5%90%8e%e7%9a%84%e6%8a%80%e6%9c%af/#comment-211 读Keven真是懒人的快事?您?集的Dion这幅图确实如您所说是对Web 2.0“作了完美的归纳?——居然还是0.5版本，从这点?看，Dion大拿真是一个严谨认真的人。
很多人的罗列，一言看去就在??概念，连概念间的关系都?清楚，居然也敢张嘴——其实，现在很多学校的教师都是这样，满嘴云山雾罩?知所云，以把学生?迷糊?掩盖自己的一知?解。
其实，很多好东西，实用起??，?百姓就有直观的认识和体验，RSS就是如此。?用跟?百姓大侃水分?的结构，得出它是无色无味?明液体的结论——给?百姓一?水，让他看看，?让他?一?，他就会知?什么?无色无味?明液体了。
?百姓问：人类社会最完美的形?是什么？
大拿说：完美社会有太多太多的特?，三言两语说?清楚，说了你也?收?了这么多的概念，一言而蔽之，共产主义社会就是最完善的社会形?。
于是，?百姓们就知?，我们的奋斗目标就是为实现共产主义社会而努力——所以，概念的确定，?失为一??事的好方法。

]]>